Australia’s founding promise was simple: one law for all. But a radical, quite shift in the High Court’s interpretation of property has effectively...
ByMaria Rigoni19/05/2026Let’s look at the reason why the 1992 Mabo decision was a political judicial error and how three centuries of natural law, occupation...
ByMaria Rigoni10/05/2026‘sovereignty’ is about the power and authority to govern. The core argument is that while Victorians overwhelmingly rejected the “Voice” in the 2023...
ByMaria Rigoni09/05/2026Imagine an Australia where the law doesn’t care how hard you work, but only who your claimed ancestors were. It sounds like a...
ByMaria Rigoni30/04/2026There is a slow-motion disaster unfolding in our highest court. Through a series of technical “re-writes,” our judiciary has presided over the birth...
ByMaria Rigoni28/04/2026The argument that the High Court of Australia overstepped its constitutional bounds or misinterpreted existing common law to reach a political outcome is...
ByMaria Rigoni20/04/2026The “1967 referendum was to advance Aboriginal people” line is pure post-Mabo propaganda, invented to justify turning the constitution into a blank cheque...
ByMaria Rigoni18/04/2026The Rule of Law is being traded for political optics, and the casualty is a unified Australian Nationhood. When an Aboriginal Elder carries...
ByMaria Rigoni13/04/2026In the 1967 Referendum the Australian people voted, in good faith, for a “spiritual” or “moral” and welfare access equality, but the legal...
ByMaria Rigoni01/04/2026Paul Keating muttered the High Court “rejected a lie and acknowledged a truth” and, after a convoluted negotiation, parliament legislated the Native Title...
ByMaria Rigoni30/03/2026