The “1967 referendum was to advance Aboriginal people” line is pure post-Mabo propaganda, invented to justify turning the constitution into a blank cheque...
ByMaria Rigoni18/04/2026The Rule of Law is being traded for political optics, and the casualty is a unified Australian Nationhood. When an Aboriginal Elder carries...
ByMaria Rigoni13/04/2026Why does Australian law permit native title to evolve rather than requiring traditional customs to remain unchanged since European settlement? The law only ask for...
ByMaria Rigoni09/04/2026While normal Aussies are getting crushed by high rents, taxes, and a housing crisis, a loud bunch of professional political ‘Aborigines’ are secretly...
ByMaria Rigoni05/04/2026It is argued that the common narrative surrounding the 1967 referendum is poppycock because the amendment to Section 127 was technically a machinery-of-government...
ByMaria Rigoni03/04/2026This blog article is to give a clear, straightforward explanation of the 1967 Australian referendum based on the actual constitutional changes and historical...
ByMaria Rigoni02/04/2026Legislation now enables High Court rulings and parliamentary amendments that let political Aboriginal claimants seize compensation or title over land Australians have lawfully...
ByMaria Rigoni01/04/2026In the 1967 Referendum the Australian people voted, in good faith, for a “spiritual” or “moral” and welfare access equality, but the legal...
ByMaria Rigoni01/04/2026In Australia, one day you may find that the land you own, the laws you follow, and the taxes you pay are no...
ByMaria Rigoni31/03/2026Paul Keating muttered the High Court “rejected a lie and acknowledged a truth” and, after a convoluted negotiation, parliament legislated the Native Title...
ByMaria Rigoni30/03/2026